This site was created to open the public's eyes to how the Mayor and City Council of Gloucester City and surrounding Camden County Towns in NJ Spend your Tax Dollars. This site is also expanding to cover Gloucester County as well. To contact this site email [email protected].
We requested the following information from The City of Gloucester in regards to there Freedom Pier Project and was told the do not have any of the documents requested.
If you read the agreement it only relates to the construction of residential properties.
Freedom Pier llc seems to be a fantom company
The issue is that these documents are required "per there agreement"
1. I am requesting all meeting minutes as outlined in section 5.1 of the Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Gloucester and Freedom Pier llc. 1/1/08 to present
2. I am requesting all progress reports as outlined in section 5.2 of the Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Gloucester and Freedom Pier llc. 1/1/08 to present
3. I am requesting all submissions as outlined in section 5.3 of the Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Gloucester and Freedom Pier llc. 1/1/08 to present
4. I am requesting all insurance documents required as outlined in section 7 of the Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Gloucester and Freedom Pier llc. 1/1/08 to present
5. I am requesting all Approvals as outlined in Exhibit E of the Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Gloucester and Freedom Pier llc. 1/1/08 to present
6. I am requesting the development agreement between Gloucester City and Freedom Pier llc that outlines the plan as described in the Gloucester city Resolution 008-2013 (there should be a new agreement as the original calls for housing not a bar/brew pub)1/1/08 to present
Email response from Gloucester City Clerk
With regards to the attached OPRA request #'s 1-6 - None
This E-mail was sent from "RNPA0B085" (Aficio 3035).
Scan Date: 05.16.2013 15:29:53 (-0400)
Queries to: [email protected]
--
Kathleen M. Jentsch
City Clerk/Registrar of Vital Statistics
City of Gloucester City
512 Monmouth St.
Gloucester City, NJ 08030
856-456-0205 ext. 218 (phone)
856-456-8030 (fax)
Email: [email protected]Municipal Bldg. Office Hours:
M-W 8 am - 5 pm
Thurs. 10 am - 7 pm
Fri. Closed
Even though home prices in New Jersey have fallen, many local governments have failed to adjust property tax valuations. This means many homeowners currently have property tax assessments based on home prices which existed during the peak of the market in 2005 & 2006.
Faced with such inequality, homeowners have a constitutional right to appeal. A successful appeal could potentially save you thousands of dollars.
Determining if you qualify for an appeal involves some basic research. The process involves checking for discrepancies in the math of your taxation board and documenting comparable properties located near you within the same price range that are paying less taxes than you are.
You can certainly do this yourself but it’s far easier with professional assistance from a knowledgeable realtor, such a myself.
Appraisers and attorneys will also appeal tax assessments on your behalf. You should know that appeals boards are frankly more likely to accept data presented by professionals than a homeowner with no experience. In fact, many such third-party cases are being won with a nearly 100% success rate and with larger settlements issued to homeowners.
Should you decide to appeal on your own, however, you’ll need to visit the office of your local assessor for the paperwork you’ll need for your petition. Keep in mind the deadline for your application is April 1st.
A handy tax appeal calculator can help you determine if you might be eligible for an appeal. This applies your current taxes and the value of your home with what the city assumes your home is worth in the market. Using these numbers the calculator differentiates between the taxes you pay and the cities assessment versus what the payment would be in the true market. You’ll need to calculate this to win an appeals process. If your home falls outside the range of 15% from the actual True Market Value you could win the appeal. (An estimated 50% of New Jersey tax assessments are currently excessive, so there is an excellent chance your own property could be eligible for a sizable tax reduction).
Links to resources to help file a property tax appeal
At the 4/24/2013 Council Meeting the council held a discussion about the idea of going paperless which would result in a cost savings to the Township. During the discussion, Council President Daniel Morley (R) asked Mayor Wallace (D) if the administration could reach ask the Superintendent of Schools if the School District had any old laptop computers they could give or lend the Township. Her response is shocking and shows what is wrong with the Norcrats...pointing to the camera she said
"I'm sure the superintendent is watching, maybe he'll answer your question."
No wonder government in New Jersey is broken with an attitude like this.
Below is
part of the personnel policy for Washington Township. It appears to be clear, and a reasonable
person and every day taxpayer would agree a family member should not be
supervising another family member. Below
the personnel policy are timesheets.
Does anyone see anything wrong?
Should a
father be approving a son or son-in-laws overtime timesheets? Is all of this overtime warranted? Could this be a reason Mayor Wallace is
raising taxes so friends can get rich?
HOWEVER
What is more
alarming is that on the timesheet for 11/12/12-11/18/12 Supervisor of Municipal
Services Frank Campbell wrote:
“QUESTIONS
WAS RAISED LAST WEEK ABOUT ME FILLING OUT THIS EMPLOYEES O.T. SHEETS. HOWEVER NICK PILLEGI TOLD ME TO CONTINUE WHAT
I HAVE BEEN DOING FOR YEARS SIGNING HIS TIME CARDS”
So Frank
Campbell has been approving his sons time cards for years? And when asks about his boss Nick Pileggi
said to continue to do so.
Recently
this site has learned that Washington Township has made $52,850 from renting
the Senior Center since January of 2012.
It is not uncommon for municipalities to rent public buildings for use
by organizations and a private party.
However unlike other towns Washington Township does not have the rental
fees for the Center in the Township’s fee ordinance. A fee ordinance set fees which allows a
municipality to charge for a service etc.
If there
is no fee schedule for the rental of the Senior Center how is the Township
legally collecting money?
Will they
pay back each person who paid a fee?
How could
the Township charge one person one amount of money and another a
different? If there is no fee ordinance,
is that legal?
Is
someone in the Township possibly pocketing money from the Senior Center for
personal gain?
Below are fee ordiances from other towns. At the meeting BA Bob Smith said that other towns were doing it wrong. Really Bob? Every other town that has set fees is doing it wrong OR is it Washington Township is doing it wrong AND you rather the public not know about it?
In Order: Runnemede Borough, Gloucester City and Berlin Borough.
It seems
like government employees who receive a taxpayer paid cell phone think they can
do anything they want with the taxpayer provided cell phone they are given. Last year it was reported on Galloway
Township News that former Galloway Township manager Stephen Bonanni was
teaching for Rutgers University while still on the clock getting paid by
Galloway Township. This information was brought
to light by a local blogger who used cell phone bills to trace Bonanni’s
location at Rutgers. In addition the
cell phone bill also linked the then Township manager to an alleged prostitution
scandal.
It
appears that Washington Township employees like to misuse taxpayer provided
cell phones as well.
Below is
a cell phone bill Washington Township received showing municipal employee Ken
Patrone had a $20.00 service charge on his township provided phone. What was the $20.00 charge for? A request for detailed bills was denied under
OPRA since the township does not receive detailed bills even though it can
easily access that information online or by asking its carrier Verizon wireless.
What was
the $20.00 special service charge for?
If an
employee misused a Township provided cell phone why did they pay $20.00 to the
Township?
Why does
the employee still have a phone?
Why is
the Township reluctant not to disclose the reason of the special charge?
What is
going on inside the Wallace Administration?